The Official Site of Shaykh Abdul Raheem (hafizahullah)

Bid'aat of Albani & his Admirers

Among Albani’s innovations in the Religion:

1- In his book Adab al-Zifaf, he prohibits women from wearing gold jewelry – rings, bracelets, and chains – despite the Consensus of the Ulema permitting it.

2- He claims that 2.5% zakât is not due on money obtained from commerce, i.e. the main activity whereby money circulates among Muslims.

3- He absolutely prohibits fasting on Saturdays.

4- He prohibits retreat (i`tikaf) in any but the Three Mosques.

5- He claims that it is lawful to eat in Ramadan before Maghrib as defined by the Law, and similarly after the true dawn.

6- He compares Hanafi fiqh to the Gospel.

7- He calls people to imitate him rather than the Imams of the Salaf such as the founders of the Four Schools, and his followers invalidate the hadiths that contradict his views.

8- He prohibits the make-up performance (qadha) of prayers missed intentionally.

9- He claims that it is permissible for menstruating women and those in a state of major defilement (junub) to recite, touch, and carry the Qur’an.

10- He claims over and over that among the innovations in religion, existent in Madina, is the persence of the Prophet’s – Allah bless and greet him – grave in the mosque.

11- He claims that whoever travels intending to visit the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – or to ask him for his intercession is a misguided innovator.

12- He claims that whoever carries dhikr-beads in his hand to remember Allah Most High is misguided and innovating.

13- He invented a location to Allah Most High above the Throne which he named al-makân al-`adamî – “the non-existent place.”

14- He claims in Tamam al-Minna that masturbation does not annul one’s fast.

15- He published “corrected” editions of the two Sahihs of al-Bukhari and Muslim, which he deceitfully called “Abridgments” (mukhtasar) in violation of the integrity of these motherbooks.

16- He published newly-styled editions of the Four Sunan, al-Bukhari’s al-Adab al-Mufrad, al-Mundhiri’s al-Targhib wa al-Tarhib, and al-Suyuti’s al-Jami` al-Saghir, each of which he split into two works, respectively prefixed Sahih and Da`if in violation of the integrity of these motherbooks.

17- He said: “Many of those who interpret figuratively [the Divine Attributes] are not heretics (zanâdiqa), but they say what heretics say,” and “figurative interpretation is the very same as nullification (al-ta’wîl `ayn al-ta`tîl).” 2

18- He suggests that al-Bukhari is a disbeliever for interpreting the Divine Face as dominion or sovereignty (mulk) in the verse “Everything will perish save His countenance” (28:88) in the book of Tafsir in his Sahih: “Except His wajh means except His mulk, and it is also said: Except whatever was for the sake of His countenance.” Albani blurts out: “No true believer would say such a thing” and “We should consider al-Bukhari innocent of that statement.” 3

19- In imitation of the Mu`tazila, tawassul (seeking means), istighâtha (asking for help), and tashaffu` (seeking intercession) through the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – or one of the Awliyâ’ he declared prohibited acts in Islam (harâm) tantamount to idolatry (shirk) in his booklet al-Tawassul as did his friends Bin Baz and those who obey them such as al-Qahtani in al-Wala’ wa al-Bara’ and others, in flat rejection of the numerous sound and explicit narrations to that effect, such as al-Bukhari’s narration of the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – from Ibn `Umar – Allah be well-pleased with him -: “Truly the sun shall draw so near on the Day of Resurrection that sweat shall reach to the mid-ear, whereupon they shall ask (istaghâthû) help from Adam – upon him peace -, then from Musa – upon him peace – , then from Muhammad – Allah bless and greet him – who will intercede (fa yashfa`u)… and that day Allah shall raise him to an Exalted Station, so that all those who are standing [including the unbelievers] shall glorify him (yahmaduhu ahlu al-jam`i kulluhum).”

20- He denies that the name of the Angel of death is `Izrâ’îl and claims such a name has no basis other than Israelite reports, although Qadhi `Iyad reports the Consensus on the Umma on it in al-Shifa’.

21- Like the rest of Wahhabi and “Salafi” innovators he declares Ash`aris, Maturidis, and Sufis to be outside the fold of Ahl al-Sunna and even outside the fold Islam, although Allah Most High and His Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – praised them! Upon revelation of the verse “Allah shall bring a people whom He loves and who love Him” (5:54), the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – pointed to Abu Musa al-Ash`ari – Allah be well-pleased with him – and said: “They are that man’s People.” 4 Al-Qushayri, Ibn `Asakir, al-Bayhaqi, Ibn al-Subki, and others said that the followers of Abu al-Hasan al-Ash`ari – i.e. Ash`aris who were mostly Sufis – are included among Abu Musa’s People for in every place that a people are affiliated to a Prophet, what is meant is the followers of that Prophet.
As for Maturidis, they are referred to in the narration of the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – from Bishr al-Khath`ami or al-Ghanawi with a sound (sahîh) chain according to al-Hakim, al-Dhahabi, al-Suyuti, and al-Haythami: “Truly you shall conquer Constantinople and truly what a wonderful leader will her leader be [Mehmet Fatih Sultan – Allah be well-pleased with him -], and truly what a wonderful army will that army be!” Both the leader and his army were classic Hanafi Maturidis and it is known that Mehmet Fatih loved and respected Sufis, practiced tawassul, and followed a Shaykh. Moreover, enmity against Ash`aris, Maturidis, and Sufis, is nifâq and enmity against the Umma of Islam as most of the Ulema of Islam are thus described.

22- In at least five of his books 5 he calls for the demolition of the Green Dome of the Prophet’s Mosque in al-Madina al-Munawwara and for taking the Prophet’s grave outside the Mosque.

23- He states: “I have found no evidence for the Prophet’s – Allah bless and greet him – hearing of the salaam of those who greet him at his grave” and “I do not know from where Ibn Taymiyya took his claim 6 that he – Allah bless and greet him – hears the salaam from someone near.” This and the previous item are among his greater enormities and bear the unmistakable signature of innovation and deviation. 7

24- He considers it an innovation to visit relatives, neighbors, or friends on the day of `Eid and prohibits it. 8

25- He gave the fatwa that Muslims should exit Palestine en masse and leave it to the Jews as it is part the Abode of War (dâr al-harb). 9

26- He advocates in his Salat al-Nabi – Allah bless and greet him -, the formula “Peace and blessings upon the Prophet” instead of “upon you, O Prophet” in the tashahhud in contradiction of the Four Sunni Schools, on the basis of a hadith of Ibn Mas`ud whereby the Companions used the indirect-speech formula after the passing of the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him -. But the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – himself instructed them to pray exactly as he prayed saying: “Peace and blessings upon you, O Prophet” without telling them to change it after his death, nor did the major Companions (whose Sunna we were ordered to imitate together with that of the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him -), such as Abu Bakr and `Umar, teach the Companions and Successors otherwise!

27- He prohibits praying more than 11 rak`as in Tarawih prayers on the grounds that the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – never did and in blatant rejection of his explicit command to follow the Sunna of the well-guided Caliphs after him.

28- He declares that adding more to 11 supererogatory rak`as in the late night prayer (tahajjud) is an innovation rather than an act of obedience on the grounds that the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – “never ever prayed one hundred rak`as in his whole lifetime” 10 although the Ulema agree that there is no prescribed limit to something which the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – commanded without specifically quantifying it, and he – Allah bless and greet him – said in three authentic narrations: “Know that the best of your good deeds is prayer,” 11 “Prayer is a light,” 12 and “The night prayer is in cycles of two [rak`as] and when one of you fears the rising of the dawn, let him pray a single one.” 13 It is also established in many authentic narrations collected by Imam `Abd al-Hayy al-Lacknawi in the second part of his Iqamat al-Hujja `ala anna al-Ikthar min al-Ta`abbudi Laysa bi Bid`a that the Companions and Salaf prayed hundreds if not thousands of rak`as in every twenty-four hours!

29- He considers it an innovation to pray four rak`as between the two adhâns of Jumu`a and before Salat, although it is authentically narrated that “the Prophet – Allah bless and greet him – prayed four rak`as before Jumu`a and four rak`as after it.” 14

30- He declares it prohibited (harâm) and an innovation to lengthen the beard over a fistful’s length although there is no proof for such a claim in the whole Law and none of the Ulema ever said it before him. 15

31- He gives free rein to his propensity to insult and vilify the Ulema of the past as well as his contemporaries. As a result it is difficult to wade through his writings without being affected by the nefarious spirit that permeates them. For example, he considers previous editors and commentators of al-Bukhari’s al-Adab al-Mufrad (“Book of Manners”!) “sinful,” “unbearably ignorant,” and even “liars” and “thieves.” Of one he says: “There are so many weak hadiths [in his choice]… that it is an unislamic practice”; of another: “It is ignorance which must not be tolerated”; of another: “Forgery and open lie… His edition is stolen [from a previous one].” 16 Such examples actually fill a book compiled by Shaykh Hasan `Ali al-Saqqaf and titled Qamus Shata’im al-Albani wa Alfazihi al-Munkara al-Lati Yatluquha `ala `Ulama’ al-Umma (“Dictionary of al-Albani’s Insults and the Heinous Words He Uses Against the Scholars of the Muslim Community”).

32- He revived Ibn Hazm’s anti-madhhabî claim that differences can never be a mercy in any case but are always a curse on the basis of the verse (If it had been from other than Allah they would have found therein much discrepancy( (4:82). 17 Imam al-Nawawi long since refuted this view in his commentary on Sahih Muslim where he said: “If something is a mercy, it is not necessary for its opposite to be the opposite of mercy. No-one makes this binding and no-one even says this, except an ignoramus or one who affects ignorance.” Similarly, al-Munawi said in Fayd al-Qadir: “This is a contrivance that showed up on the part of some of those who have sickness in their heart.”

33- He expresses hatred for those who read Imam al-Busiri’s masterpiece, Qasidat al-Burda, and calls them cretins (mahâbîl) 18, i.e. millions of Muslims past and present including the likes of Imams Ibn Hajar al-`Asqalani, al-Sakhawi, and al-Suyuti who all included it as required reading in the Islamic curriculum. 19

34- He perpetuates lies if they detract from Ash`aris, such as his remark that Imam Sayf al-Din al-Amidi did not pray, 20 although Dr. Hasan al-Shafi`i in his massive biography entitled al-Amidi wa Ara’uhu al-Kalamiyya showed that the story that al-Amidi did not pray was a forgery put into circulation during the campaign waged by Imam Ibn al-Salah against him for teaching logic and philosophy in Damascus.

35- He perpetuates the false claim first made by Munir Agha the founder of the Egyptian Salafiyya Press, that Imam Abu Muhammad al-Juwayni – the father of Imam al-Haramayn – “repented” from Ash`ari doctrine and supposedly authored a tract titled Risala fi Ithbat al-Istiwâ’ wa al-Fawqiyya (“Epistle on the Assertion of Establishment and Aboveness”). 21 This spurious attribution continues to be promoted without verification – for obvious reasons – by modern-day “Salafis” who adduce it to forward the claim that al-Juwayni embraced anthropomorphist concepts. The Risala in question is not mentioned in any of the bibliographical and biographical sources nor does al-Dhahabi cite it in his encyclopedia of anthropomorphist views entitled al-`Uluw. More conclusively, it is written in modern argumentative style and reflects typically contemporary anthropomorphist obsessions.

36- He derides the fuqahâ’ of the Umma for accepting – in their massive majority – the hadith of Mu`adh ibn Jabal on ijtihâd as authentic then rejects the definition of knowledge (`ilm) in Islam as pertaining to fiqh but claims that it pertains only to hadith, 22 although the Ulema of the Salaf explicitly said that a hadith master without fiqh is a misguided innovator! And he defines the `âlim as “meaning, of course, the `Salafi’ `âlim, not the `Khalafi [late Egyptian Shaykh] Ghazali’!” 23 Al-Qurtubi said: “One of the knowers of Allah said: A certain group that has not yet come up in our time but shall show up at the end of time, will curse the scholars and insult the jurists.” 24


1 In his commentary on al-Mundhiri’s Mukhtasar Sahih Muslim, 3rd ed. (Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islami, 1977, p. 548). This phrase was removed from later editions.

2 Fatawa (p. 522-523) and Mukhtasar al-`Uluw (p. 23f.).

3 Fatawa (p. 523).

4 Narrated from `Iyad by Ibn Abi Shayba and al-Hakim who said it is sahîh by Muslim’s criterion, and by al-Tabarani with a sound chain as stated by al-Haythami.

5 Ahkam al-Jana’iz wa Bida`uha, Talkhis Ahkam al-Jana’iz, Tahdhir al-Sajid, Hijjat al-Nabi, and Manasik al-Hajj wa al-`Umra.

6 In Majmu`a al-Fatawa (27:384).

7 In his notes on Nu`man al-Alusi’s al-Ayat al-Bayyinat (p. 80) and his Silsila Da`ifa (#203).

8 Fatawa (p. 61-63).

9 Fatawa (p. 18).

10 Fatawa (p. 315-316).

11 Narrated as part of a longer hadith from Thawban with sound chains by Ibn Majah and Ahmad. Malik cites it in his Muwatta’.

12 Part of a longer hadith narrated from Abu Malik al-Ash`ari (Ka`b ibn `Asim) by Muslim, al-Tirmidhi (hasan sahîh), al-Nasa’i, Ibn Majah, Ahmad, and al-Darimi.

13 Narrated from Ibn `Umar in the Nine Books.

14 With a fair chain from `Ali and Ibn `Abbas as stated by al-`Iraqi in Tarh al-Tathrib (3:42), Ibn Hajar in Talkhis al-Habir (2:74), and al-Tahanawi in I`la’ al-Sunan (7:9).

15 Fatawa (p. 53).

16 Sahih al-Adab al-Mufrad (Introduction, p. 15, 20, 26).

17 Al-Silsila al-Da`ifa (1:76 #57).

18 Introduction to al-San`ani’s Raf` al-Astar (p. 24-25).

19 Cf. al-Suyuti, Husn al-Muhadara (Cairo 1293 ed. 1:260) and al-Sakhawi, in A.J. Arberry, Sakhawiana: A Study Based on the Chester Beatty Ms. Arab. 773 (London: Emery Walker Ltd., 1951, p. 5-9).

20 In his notes to Nu`man al-Alusi’s al-Ayat al-Bayyinat (p. 88).

21 Mukhtasar al-`Uluw (p. 277).

22 In his notes on al-Qasimi’s al-Mash `ala al-Jawrabayn (p. 38). On the hadith of Mu`adh see our May 1999 post titled, “[4] Probativeness of the Sunna” and Note 5 in that post.

23 Tahrim Alat al-Tarab (p. 160).

24 Al-Qurtubi, Tafsir (7:191).

Edited from the following link:

Albani and his Fabrications in Books of Hadith (1)

5 Responses

  1. Khawar

    Bismihi Ta’ala,
    Respected Ml. Saheb,
    Assalaamu ‘Alaykum Wa Rahmatullaahi Wa Barakatuhu,

    Please remove this post. You got the link from a pure Brelvi website that is also spitting venom against Deobandis. Can you verify each of the claim made? How can you be sure that the Brelvi’s were not over taken by their bias towards the salafi and have landered Shaykh Al-Bani. Of course, Shaykh Al-Bani made mistakes, but we have to be sure that we correctly reference his mistakes; Brelvis can’t be trusted to do that.

    We [Deobandis] have to be academically honest.


    ———————- —————-

    Walaikumussalam w w

    Jazakallah for your concerns and sorry for the late reply.

    I have read article again and I feel that it’s not written by any barelwi alim. It refers to some Turkish ulema and therefore it seems to have been written by some ulema in Turkey. Their ulema have profound knowledge and they have been guardians of the haramayn for nearly 8 centuries of our Islamic history. Besides, truth comes from the truthful, whoever they are.

    I checked some references given in the article and I found them to be correct eg. regarding the khitaab in tashahhud. Albani has tried to prove that ‘Assalamu Alannabiyyi’ is more preferable. Other things are well known regarding his beliefs and they don’t need researching. Some things said regarding ash’ari and maturdi are new for me and I do not have the sources to check them out so we will leave them to the writer.

    In my limited research, I feel that Albani has caused so much damage to the Muslim literature that it’s beyond repair. It’s not just a few things which we can rectify, he has annihilated the confidence of the public on the salafe saliheen as well as the contemporary ulema. He made himself the main authority and then imposed his ideologies on the masses.

    What the writer has mentioned is just a tip of the iceberg. If you explore with an open mind, you will be shocked at the level of abuse Albani has hurled on imam Abu Hanifa in particular and then on the whole hanafi fiqh, and the rest were nothing in front of him. He would easily scold legends like imam shafi’ee, Ibn hajar, imam nawawi, and the likes, if they had written something he doesn’t like.

    He messed up Riyadussaliheen, Al Adhkaar and similar books by omitting chapters which he could not agree with.
    And the salafi scholars are either turning a blind eye to all this or they are ignorant, and whatever the case, they will be held to account in the court of Allah on the day of qiyamah, as will we if we say something to corrupt Allah’s Deen. May Allah protect us and keep us steadfast.

    I don’t want to be harsh or rude, but I genuinely feel that this whole group of Albani, bin baaz, Zakir naik, Yusuf Este, Abdul Raheem green, Bilal Philips etc have so much to answer on the day of judgement.

    It is our ulema who have preserved the Sunnah in it’s purest form and it is they who have sleepless nights in worry for the ummah. It is they who run around trying to hold the ummah together. And it is they who are being murdered around the world and it is they who are the firaqe naajiyah, inshallah.

    So please hold on to your mashaaikh and I beg Allah to keep us on the path of those whom He has favoured and to keep us well away from the path of those upon whom His wrath fell and of those who went stray. Ameen

  2. Adiy

    Asalaamu Aalaikum,

    Shaykh Sahib, have you checked the references provided to confirm that they are correct. I want to show this to some salafi brothers and I need to know that the sources are correct.

    ————— ————– ————

    Walaikumussalam w w

    If you feel it will be beneficial, you should be ok to show it.

  3. Adiy

    Asalaamu Aalaikum.

    What is the perspective of the Deobandi `Ulama with regards to Ibn Uthaymeen and Bin Baz? – I’ve heard Hanafi `Ulama quote Ibn Uthaymeen quite a few times.

    ———————– —————————–

    Once I was with shaykh Yunus Saheb in a bookshop in haramayn shareefayn, he was very ecstatic and buying every book he could get his hands on.

    Suddenly there was a commentary on Riyadussaliheen in 8 volumes. Shaykh had a look at it, and then put it back saying these ulema don’t have the in depth knowledge that our ulema have. The author was Ibn uthaymeen.

    I have also studied his work and read Ibn baaz’s footnotes on various books like Aqeeqah tahaawiyyah, Fat’hul baari, Haj booklets etc. They are very vague, biased, disregarding of any other view besides their own.

    I remember what our akaabir said regarding mawdoodi’s books at the time, that the ulema can read his works but the awaam should avoid. I would say the same regarding the current extremist type salafees.

  4. muhammod

    salam shaykh

    I pray one day both you and Sh GF Haddad write a book against the latter day salafees.

    in a addition to this awesome website please visit livingislam. org. plenty of refutation of neo salafis . the shakyh also loves deobondis

Leave a Reply